some strength and stability? The proposition does not even seem to make a moot point, it surely answers itself and makes a strong case for the acceptance and recognition of the femmepersona.

I am absolutely convinced that in those cases where FPia has been accepted by wives and others, their acceptance has resulted in a greater sum of human happiness than would have been the case had they rejected or forbidden it, and that those cases in which it has been rejected would have ended far more happily for all concerned, if more effort at adjust- ment and acceptance had been made.

I suspect that if you were to take at random a number of FPs and an equal number of non-FPs and awarded each with points for such attributes as kindliness, tolerance, consideration for others, good manners, reluc- tance to take mean advantages of others, etc., etc., then it would be the FPs who would record the highest scores.

If so, are non-FPs qualified or entitled to pass judgement on FPs?

And again, there are those who whilst themselves blessed with every advantage that life has to offer in great abundance, would condemn an FP whose FPia is perhaps the one and only thing in his life that makes it tolerable at all.

With very grateful thanks for the immense benefit derived from your book, and with some hope that I may hear from you.

In case you should reply, I have made a copy of this so that I shall know to what various aspects you might make reference. I shall not be depend- ing on my memory of this.

Dear Virginia,

Sincerely, Eileen

I have just read, together with my wife, your wonderful book, "The Transvestite and His Wife". You have done us a wonderful service and I would venture to say many other couples probably feel as we do.

We are most interested in obtaining information about FPE and Transvestia could you please help us. We realize your time is valuable, but wanted to express our thanks and progress forward into a whole new glorious world that you have opened our eyes to being available to us.

Sincerely, Joan & wife